Friday, August 22, 2008

5 Other Ways Baseball Can Modernize The Game

Now that baseball has proven that they can adapt to the modern times by adopting Instant Replay, we at the Deuce think it's time for the great American past time to take a few more steps to becoming a modern day sporting bonanza. Here's a few other ways that we think Major League Baseball can take steps towards modernizing the game for the 2000s.

1) Allow Cheerleaders

The NFL has them, the NBA has them, NHL even has rink girls, baseball needs cheerleaders. Who wouldn't rather see a bunch of cheerleaders dancing on the dugout instead of homer run homer? Baseball has to realize, like all the other sports already have, that sex sells and people need that sexually charged visual stimuli when there is a break in the action...which there are a ton of in a typical baseball game. Teams in Latin America and the minor leagues have already thought of this, the pros need to up their game.
2) Turn on a Pitch Clock

Think of what the 24 second clock and the 35 second clock have done for basketball and football. They've sped up the game and made it more enjoyable with constant action and less farting around. With a pitch clock, the pitcher would have something like 15 seconds to get the pitch off from the moment that he catches the ball from his catcher. No more shaking off pitches and running through the count again, no more constant glances to a base with no throw, no more standing around playing with the rosin bag and scratching yourself waiting for something to happen. If the pitch isn't thrown, the batter gets an automatic ball.

3) Screw It, No More Umps, Computerize it all.

Baseball is not a game where a human's discretion really should into play. There are no penalties or fouls. There is just whether the ball is inside or outside lines, whether the player touches a base and whether the ball touches the player or not. Certainly, the current margin of error can be erased with modern technology. With instant replay now in effect, baseball has made a great stride but it is time for them to go all the way. Tennis employs the Hawk Eye technology which can be used for line calls, cricket is testing it out right now as well, so why can baseball not use them for foul lines?

Baseball has already tested out the Questec system for balls and strikes, why not use it full time? This would take out individual strike zones for umpires favoring pitchers or batters on any given night. It'll be a level playing field for all.

For whether or not a player is out, bio-kinetic sensors and microchips in the balls, gloves and bases could easily tell if contact with a player was made before contact with a bag was made no longer making the ghost base tag force out allowable. The game would finally be played the way it was supposed to be played without umpire's personal preferences getting in the way.

4) No More Rainouts

Be a man, get wet you pansies. No real sport played outdoors cancels a game because it is raining or snowing. Nascar will do it because you're in a vehicle flying around a track at 200mph and its a bit dangerous to bank when you're hydroplaning. Tennis and Cricket will do it because...well because they are a bunch of pansies. Baseball should strive to be tougher than tennis and cricket players. Dangerous lighting is a perfectly good reason to stop a game, but rain? Come on, you play outside, deal with the weather.

5) Relegation

This would redefine modern baseball as we know it. Take a page from the English Premiership and force the lowest performing teams drop down, out of the Majors, and allow the best lower level league teams move up to the Majors. Crazy? Sure it is, but will it force bottom feeders like the Royals and the Nationals to get their shit together and get it together quick or there will be no more MLB television revenue coming in. Its a reward system for not sucking and makes the super long regular season almost more meaningful than the playoffs and certainly more meaningful than it currently is.

So here's how it would be done. The easy way to do it is to take the 3 worst teams from each league right now, 6 teams overall and drop them down into the newly created lower level that we will for now call AAAA. Baseball functioned quite fine before the expansions to 26 then 30 teams with a 162 game schedule and it will again. Then, add in 2 expansion teams to the new league make it a nice 8 team league (like the AL and the NL were before expansion in the 60s) and have them play the old 154 game schedule. Bingo bango you now have the Major League Baseball - Premier League of 24 teams and the Major League Baseball AAAA League of 8 teams. Every year, the worst team in the AL and NL would drop down to the 4A league and be shamed and the best 2 teams would pop up to the Premier league.

Now that is exciting baseball. The Nationals right now are no more than a AAAA league team anyway, they should be playing against teams that are more their level until they can make it up to professional standards.

Man...one can dream.

Baseball photo by Matt McGee

19 comments:

DMtShooter said...

Relegation was proposed by Bill James twenty years ago in an essay in which he proposes the abolishing of the minor leagues. I concur 100%. Why should a fire sale team be allowed to stay in MLB? Screw 'em!

Anonymous said...

The Atlanta Braves already have cheerleaders. And they do make a baseball game more interesting.

Edward Greene said...

Peter Gammons also wrote about deregulation in an ESPN column about 8 years ago where the majors would be divided into three ten team classes. Like all your ideas except for the rainouts. I know how hard it is to throw a wet baseball, it's not like football were an errant pass gets picked, an errant pitch can fracture someone's face.

The Professor said...

i give you credit for at least coming up with a relegation system that is plausible, unlike the other 50 times i have heard this suggestion only for that writer to propose just switching the worst MLB teams and the best AAA teams, which obviously creates an infinite number of problems considering the minor league teams are not independent of major league teams.

but your scenario is not without problems.

1. more expansion? yes i know you have actually lowered the number of official major league teams but in essence you are increasing the number of major league players. many think the league is diluted enough already.

2. What happens if the 2 worst teams come from the same league or worse, the same division? What if they both came from the NL West? Adn the 2 teams coming up are in the East...Would you then play the next season with just 2 teams in the NL West? This country is a little bigger size-wise than England, where half the teams play in London.

3. what exactly is the accomplishment? punishment? that is the only thing i see. The only effect on the rest of the league is fewer teams they have to play. Otherwise all you have done is taken a team that probably wouldn't have competed anyway and moved them to a different league, unless....

4. We are talking about the TAMPA BAY RAYS!! The Rays had the worst record in baseball last year. And this season you have them in your mythical AAAA league instead of being the best story in baseball and beating up on the Red Sox AND the Yankees. If the Rays were relegated baseball would once again have the boring status quo in the AL East.

5. And while i admit, you add a little excitement and an extra "race" at the end of the season, you risk hindering development in small-market clubs. Would the rays have been forced to trade away some prospects last year for a veteran or two to help them climb out of last place? How does that make any sense?

Anonymous said...

Most of these suggestions are implausible, and definitely written by a football fan. Baseball will never be football, so quit bitching.

Anonymous said...

Two years ago I wrote my senior thesis on the health of German soccer. I remember reading a few excellent books that describe the distinct differences in the formation of soccer and baseball. As a Pirates fan, I'd love for nothing more than a kick in their pants to put a winning team on the field. But relegation can never happen in American sports, because unlike Europe where there are numerous club teams and can advance/be relegated, the American system uses bidding for expansion and creates territorial exclusivity with its teams.

Even a newer league like MLS uses the same stupid American system, when they could have easily incorporated the two or three other soccer leagues in the country. The business models are just too different to implement in the US.

Chimpanzee Rage said...

@ The Professor

You certainly bring up a lot of valid problems with the relegation idea. Since i pretty much thought of it off the cuff, let me see if i can figure out some answers to your problems just as quickly

1) One man's dillution is another man's parity.

2) I think with this sort of massive change, we might have to do away with the divisional structure as we have it make the AL and NL each just 12 team leagues with no divisions.

3) The accomplishment is indeed punishment, it is a system set in place to reward those who make an effort to compete rather than just sitting on the pile of money their professional team is generating. MLB fans shouldn't have to pay MLB money for rebuilding projects that cannot compete.

4) Indeed the Rays would have been relegated last year, but their young team would have dominated the AAAA league this year and gained an extra year of experience without the pressure of being in a MLB penant race. Next year, they might be better equipped to handle the race and playoffs. It could actually aide in their development in the long term.

5)What is the benefit of finishing in last place now? I dont think any team should want to finish in last place and should try anything to get out of it, that means you're making your team better. This would just provide more incentive to either finish out of the bottom or do your rebuilding project in the AAAA league. No sense in paying major league dollars for a minor league product.

matt said...

No real sport played outdoors cancels a game because it is raining or snowing. Nascar will do it because Nascar isn't a real sport.

Corrected.

I love the idea of relegation and think all sports leagues should figure out a way to do it. Imagine if the Sonics had gotten to move to OKC, but as punishment for their shit-tastic exit had to spend this season in the NBDL (with Miami) while the NBDL teams from Idaho and LA got to play in the NBA. (Added bonus, the Clippers have to try to beat out the third LA team in the standing next year.)

Jon Splett said...

In the case of the Devil Rays and relegation, you're not looking at the big picture.

The Rays have been the worst team for a LONG time and would have spent the last few seasons in the AAAA. But they'd also wouldn't have been subjected to the Yankees and Red Sox 38 games a year while trying to develop young players. While they were the worst team in the majors last year, chances are pretty good they would have been halfway decent in a league full of crappy teams. Instead of them being 30 games out by the all-star break for the past decade, they could have been in the hunt for a shot at getting back to the big leagues and I'm pretty sure Devil Rays fans would have taken that the team they have thrown out there. Plus, the storyline only gets better. When they finally do get promoted, they come out as a redeemed, playoff calibur team.

Anonymous said...

I strongly believe that relegation would benefit the sport, but there are some massive obstacles in addition to the ones mentioned above.

First, you have the player's union, which might be placated by the addition of 2 additional teams, but since the revenues of the AAAA teams would be lower, the salary cap would also have to be lower, meaning less pay. If you look at the economics of Football in England, you see that there are quite a few teams outside the Premiership that are teetering on bankruptcy, because an overwhelming percentage of the television revenue is directed to the Premiership clubs.

When you look at the economics of minor leagues in all sports in the US, there are quite a few teams, and even leagues, in trouble, and those economics get worce with the current economic climate (recession) and $4 gasoline, becuase travel expenses are at an all-time high while consumer entertainment spending is falling.

Another problem to address is the god-forsaken designated hitter. Maybe this change would be the stroke that forced MLB's hand, standardizing the leagues, and I pray to all things holy that they remove the DH (though I know the player's union fights tooth and nail to keep a place in lineups for overweight, one-tool veterans).

These problems are not presented to crap on your idea, as I said I believe this would be great for baseball!

Anonymous said...

We have cheerleaders in Arizona too. I love the idea of the clock for pitchers.

Anonymous said...

Go Relegation!

Make 3 divisions, 10-12 teams each. Cut the season down to 140+ games, give a week off here and there for world baseball classic, or traditional rivalries (in case one rival drops out of the same division), etc. Or just time off to recover.

Union would buy in if revenue sharing remained close. Put the middle division at the current amount, Premier gets +10%, bottom gets -10%. Great point above about the Rays, they or any expansion team could work their way up from AAAA instead of being thrown to the wolves for 10 years.

Have playoffs for the last team to move down (if three go down, two are automatic, 3rd and 4th worst play off for it.) Would keep more games relevant later in the year...

Lots of possibilities...

Mike said...

So many issues with all of this.

1) Playing in the rain - have you ever thrown a water logged baseball? Obviously not b/c if you had you'd know the insane number of injuries that would occur.

2) Pitcher's clock? How would this change when there are runners on base(how easy would it be to steal a base when you can see the pitcher will 100% throw the ball in two seconds)? What about batters who step out of the box for 5-10 seconds between pitches? What about defensive shifts?

3) Relegation? These teams barely get fans now, if you took them out of the MLB system all of their revenue would disappear cursing them to be terrible forever. Unlike football and basketball, baseball scouts travel the country and world b/c they can't just follow the college/international leagues. It takes MLB money to do this.

Maybe you need to accept you just aren't a baseball fan.

Chimpanzee Rage said...

@ Mike

I love the game, i'm just throwing out these ideas for this kind of fun discussion that we're all enjoying.

1) Have you ever thrown a waterlogged football? Its not fun either. Oooh i might get hurt! This is what i'm talkin about when i say pansies. If a player is worried about injury, wear a mask, those are allowed, kids wear them all the time playing ball...and they are pansies too.

2) Batters wouldnt get a chance to step out like they do because a ball is coming whether they are in there or not, thats the point, speed the game up, if runners steal, hey thats a good thing, more action is more fun.

3) They wouldn't be out of the MLB system, the AAAA league is a part of the MLB system.

Anonymous said...

I like the idea of a pitching clock... curbing the amount of power a pitcher has to dictate the pace of the game would be fine, but if you're going to do that then you need to also have some system to keep batters in check. They shouldn't be allowed to do their elaborate routines (buckling and unbuckling their batting gloves, adjusting their shoes, etc) that you see them do after every f-ing pitch. so they'd need some sort of rule to adjust to that, or the pitchers clock shouldn't start until the batter has taken his place in the box. But then how much time are you actually going to save if batters can still do their shit?

Unknown said...

Hey, neat! I've always wondered what it would be like to see the 5 worst ideas in history lined up right next to each other. Thanks for this amazing opportunity to witness it!

Anonymous said...

1) Cincinnati has had Cheerleaders for several years. 2) Its already a rule, umpires just need to start calling it. 3) Not a bad idea but still don't like it 4) Baseballs are hard to catch when your looking up at the rain and its also really hard to run in the mud. 5) If the worst teams were put in the minors you wouldn't have stories like 69 mets and 08 Rays.

Anonymous said...

IF the "AAAA" teams would have lower salaries, what happens to the 2 teams the come up the following year and are forced to play against MLB players with "AAAA" salaries. And whats happens to the 2 MLB teams that get dropped? Would the salaries of the players automatically be cut? That would leave too many disgruntled players and too many players would be asking to be traded. This would make the rebuilding process even harder because no way would any star/future star resign with the "AAAA" team neither would any free agents sign with them. The Pirates were the 2nd worst team in the MLB last year, meaning they would have dropped, therefore players such as Nate McLouth and Jason Bay would be playing in the minors. Two obvious MLB talents wasting their primes in a development league, it just wouldn't happen. Sounds like a good idea at first, it just wouldn't ever work out.

Jack The K said...

In general soccer terms, when a team gets relegated everyone - players, coaches, even stadium staff and the like - all take pay cuts. It is part of the economic reality of playing in a lower league.

I have long been a proponent of relegation/promotion in baseball, and while I don't have all the answers - that's for folks with more administrative minds than I - I don't buy the "people will have to take pay cuts if they get relegated." If you don't want to take a pay cut, play better and don't get relegated in the first place.

The teams that drop are almost always - and we're talking like 99.999999999999bar50000% of the time - the ones that SHOULD be relegated. Teams punching above their weight, in the long run, is good for no one because that makes the crash that much worse when it comes.